LOGIC Macro Regime Back-Test
Most portfolios are built for markets that keep rewarding risk. This page shows what the historical data looks like when you separate the environment into Risk-On and Risk-Off instead of averaging everything together.
What the back-test is showing
FRAMEWORKWhy this matters
SUMMARYThe point is not to call every market move. The point is to avoid owning a portfolio that is mismatched with the environment. In Risk-On periods, broad equity exposure and cyclicals are generally rewarded. In Risk-Off periods, returns usually slow, volatility rises, and portfolios often become far less efficient.
That is the key takeaway from the back-test. For the S&P 500, average monthly return drops from 1.5% in Risk-On to 0.8% in Risk-Off, while volatility rises from 3.7% to 4.7%. Return per unit of risk falls from 0.41 to 0.17. The damage is not always a crash. Often it is prolonged undercompensated risk.
The sectors that tend to hold up best in Risk-Off are the defensive core: Healthcare, Consumer Staples, and Utilities, with Energy as the notable exception when the stress is driven by supply-side shocks. By contrast, Technology, Consumer Discretionary, Industrials, and Materials tend to see a much larger deterioration in efficiency when the risk bias turns.
Try the Back-Test Analyzer
INTERACTIVE PREVIEWSee how investments behaved in each LOGIC environment
Explore a representative sample across currencies, fixed income, equities and commodities. Paid subscribers unlock all 52 investments, custom dates, the complete leaderboard and the full regime heatmap.
Historical period: September 2011 through March 2026.
Return versus volatility
Risk-Return LinePreview leaderboard
The back-test shows what worked. The Monthly Macro Map tells you which environment comes next and how to properly position based on historical winners and losers.
Unlock all 52 investments, eight environment views, custom dates, the full heatmap, and the current LOGIC Macro Regime.
What tends to hold up vs. fade
POSITIONINGWhen the backdrop is Risk-On
- Broader equity beta is generally rewarded.
- Technology and Consumer Discretionary tend to lead.
- Cyclicals usually carry stronger return/risk profiles.
- Aggressive positioning is more likely to be paid for.
When the backdrop is Risk-Off
- Portfolio efficiency becomes more important than chasing upside.
- Healthcare, Staples, and Utilities tend to provide a ballast.
- Energy can still work when inflation or supply shocks drive the stress.
- Cyclicals often stop compensating investors for the risk taken.
Risk Bias Score sector back-test
DATAAverage monthly total return, volatility, and return/risk ratio
This table shows how major S&P sectors (ETF ticker tested) performed.
What tends to outperform / underperform in each Macro Regime?
STYLE FACTORS & SECTORSBelow is a list of how style factors and sectors have tended to behave in each macro regime. Historical tendencies only, not a guarantee of future results and not investment advice.
Back-Test Positioning Matrix
Overweight and underweight positioning across the eight macro environments.
Bottom line
TAKEAWAYInvestors usually spend too much time trying to pick the right asset and not enough time asking whether that asset fits the regime. The bigger source of underperformance is often not being wrong on a stock. It is being wrong on the environment.
See the LOGIC Macro Regime and Risk Bias Score in advance
The Monthly Macro Map is designed to classify the environment ahead of time so you can stay invested with exposures that better match the Macro Regime and Risk Bias instead of reacting after the fact.
